Figure 1: Kick serve technique showing all sequences throughout the entire skill. (Flickr, 2012). |
Introduction:
The serve in Tennis has become a hot
topic of late due to the varying styles used and the impact it has on overall
performance. Due to the serve being one of the most important strokes in tennis
it has provided significant biomechanical interest (Reid, Whiteside, Gilbin
& Elliott, 2013) to determine the most effective technique. The serve plays
a pre-eminent role in player development and for this reason a powerful and
accurate serve is a priority for most players (Reid, et al., 2013). The serve
is an attacking phase where the aim is to hit the ball into the opposition’s
service area, and to make it difficult for the opponent to return the ball. There
are four phases of the tennis serve; preparation, windup and ball release, acceleration
and the follow through, and each stage is a direct result of muscle activation
and technical adjustments made from the previous stage (Kovacs &
Ellenbecker, 2011). Each phase of the tennis serve requires biomechanics to
determine which principles optimise the speed and accuracy of the serve in
order to create an efficient performance.
This stroke in tennis is a sequence of
motions that is commonly referred to as the ‘kinetic chain’, where the ‘chain’
begins with lower limb actions and is followed by rotations of the trunk and
the upper limbs (Martin, Bideau, Bideau, Nicolas, Delamarche & Kulpa, 2014).
The kinetic chain permits the summation, generation and the transfer of
mechanical energy to generate a high ball velocity (Martin, et al., 2014). The
throw-like pattern of the kinetic chain is closely related to the tennis serve,
as the joints of the kinetic chain extend in a sequence rather than at the same
time, as can be seen in Figure 2 below. In the serve much of the force production begins in the legs and hips and continues to the shoulder where it extends, while the elbow and wrist is still
flexing (Blazevich, 2010).
Preparation phase:
Preparation phase:
During the preparation phase of the Tennis serve,
there are minimal biomechanical principles that can be applied. This is because
it is a phase where the player is preparing the shot mentally in order to
perform an accurate serve. In the preparation phase, the server will have their
non-preferred foot up to the line, with the ball in their non-preferred hand
and the racquet in their preferred hand. As can be seen in figure 3 below, the non preferred foot should be lined
up diagonally across the court with the preferred foot parallel to the base
line, which provides good base support and act as a guide for where the
ball from the serve is intended to go. Muscular activation during this stage is
low, because there is no demand for movement. The overall goal of the
preparation stage is to align the body to utilise the ground for force and
power generation (Kovacs & Ellenbecker, 2011) for the upcoming stages.
Ball
release and wind up:
The wind up phase begins at the
start of motion and ends with the ball release from the non-dominant hand to
initiate the ball toss (Abrams, Sheets, Andriacchi & Safran, 2011).
This phase of the tennis serve
occurs when the ball is released above the head from the nondominant hand, but
in control so it can be easily accessed by the racquet. The ball release should
be out slightly lateral to the overhead position of the server (Kovacs &
Ellenbecker, 2011), where the racquet should hit the ball at approximately 100
degrees of the overall arm abduction (Kovacs & Ellenbecker, 2011). During
the ball release phase, the player should prepare for loading with the
‘foot-up’ technique (Kovacs & Ellenbecker, 2011), which will allow for a
greater vertical height. To gain a better understanding of the stance at this stage, figure 4 below shows the foot-up technique and the full arm extension.
When loading, the ground reaction
forces from bending the knees result in an off-centre angular impulse (Kovacs & Ellenbecker, 2011) which
elevates the arm holding the racquet and lowers the opposite side of the body.
This action produces a shoulder over-shoulder rotation as the server
explosively moves the arm toward the position of ball contact (Kovacs &
Ellenbecker, 2011). These movements require the principle of angular momentum
from the lower limbs to the upper limbs (Kovacs & Ellenbecker, 2011),
ultimately allowing for greater racquet height.
During this phase angular
momentum is increased as the server swings their arms vigorously, and the
opposite side of the body moves in the opposite direction to reduce the total angular
momentum (Blazevich, 2010). The vigorous movement of the arm during the serve can
be explained through the use of Newtons third law ‘for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction’ (Blazevich, 2010). The arm movement in the serve creates an equal and opposite
reaction rotation in the arms (Blazevich, 2010), where the action of the ball
toss arm balances out the action of the racquet arm and by circling the arm in
one direction (in this case the racket arm), the body will rotate in the other.
Essentially, when the right arm
swings from the front to the back of the body on the sagittal plane-in front
past the hip, the more quickly the arm will swing and the more angular momentum
it will possess (Blazevich, 2010).
Acceleration
phase:
In tennis there are
many styles of the serve however kick or topspin serves as they are commonly known, are proven to be most
accurate to landing in the service box. Kick serves cause the ball to spin at a
higher rate which creates aerodynamic forces, where the ball has more curved
trajectory, causing it to drop into the service box (Sheets, Abrams, Corazza,
Safran & Andriacchi, 2011). More commonly used for second serves, the high percentage
of serves that land in the service area have moderate velocity due to the spin
and the forces that cause the ball to drop as it slows (Abrams, et al., 2011).
At the acceleration stage, the
server will begin by jumping off the ground after the ball has been released
and have their knees fully extended for ultimate vertical height. Upon impact
of the ball, the racquet arm should be accelerated and extended at approximately
100 degrees, which will allow for optimum velocity. When the racquet comes into
contact with the ball Newtons second law is put into place as ‘the acceleration of an object is
proportional to the net force acting on it’ (Blazevich, 2010), because the state of motion is
going to be changed, the force of the ball is greater and the faster it will
move. In saying this, the overall ball speed is determined by
the amount of force that is acted on it through the racquet. The product of mass
and acceleration, force induces a change in the mobile state of an object
(Blazevich, 2010) and therefore the more force applied to the tennis ball
during the serve, the greater the acceleration of the serve will be.
When a force is applied at a distance from the
centre of rotation, this is defined as torque (Blazevich, 2010). The rotation
of the shoulder and the arm during this serve is caused by the magnitude of the
force (Blazevich, 2010) being acted upon, and therefore the rotation of the
shoulder determines the speed of the serve. However in saying that as can be seen in figure 5 below, the further
the racquet is from making contact with the ball and the greater the height is when the racquet connects with the ball, the greater the moment of
force will be due to greater rotation and further distance to gain momentum.
Having minimal variability in the hand position when the ball and racquet come
into contact means that the ball speed will be increased (Abrams, et al., 2011).
In order to increase the speed and velocity of the ball in the serve, the force
of the racquet should be increased. This can be done by amplifying the arm speed and increasing the acceleration of the racquet before it impacts the ball. The greater the acceleration of the racquet during this stage, the
greater the force will be when the racquet connects with the ball which will
then increase the speed of the ball.
Follow
through:
The follow through is the last phase of the tennis
serve, which generally allows the player to prepare for the next shot. At this
phase the body is decelerating after taking the serve, allowing for the body to
recover for the oppositions returned shot. During deceleration the server
should have prepared themselves for lower body landing and stabilise the trunk
(Kovacs & Ellenbecker, 2011). By using the foot-up technique previously
discussed, the servers centre of mass will essentially shift forward (Kovacs &
Ellenbecker, 2011) due to the force acted upon the body. Centre of mass is the
point at which the mass of the body is evenly distributed in all directions
(Blazevich, 2010), and for this reason the bodys centre of mass lies within the
base of support in order to provide balance. Because there is a force applied
at a distance from the centre of mass from the ball connecting with the racquet, it
is important not to over-rotate so ground reaction forces are not delivered
inappropriately (Blazevich, 2010). After the player has taken the serve it is
vital to decelerate and prepare for the next shot to be taken by stabilising
the trunk shown in figure 7 below, as this will allow for the centre of mass to be evenly distributed
throughout the body in order to provide balance.
The Answer:
The Answer:
In order to serve an efficient shot that
optimises the speed and accuracy of the ball, it is noted that the kick serve
is a technique that will allow for advantageous placement in the oppositions
service box, and also by adapting the foot-up technique that will provide
greater vertical height and potentially a higher speed. These techniques are biomechanically proven to be
beneficial to the server, in order to make it more difficult for the opposition
to return the ball.
The kick serve is most effective for accuracy and to
land in the oppositions service box, due to the high rate in which the ball
spins and the aerodynamic nature of the ball. The kick serve allows the ball to
drop as it slows down and thus, causes the ball to drop in the opposition’s
service area (Abrams, et al., 2011), which may
prove to be difficult for the opposition to return the ball. While producing
the kick serve is beneficial to the server due to the accuracy it generates,
serving a ball with a high speed decreases the likelihood of the opposition being
able to return the ball which potentially allows the server to gain more
winning points throughout the game. In order to determine the efficiency of the
tennis serve, many biomechanical principles have been adapted to establish the
most effective ways to serve the ball. Throughout tennis the kinetic chain is
extremely involved as the shot is being played, as body movements begin in the
lower limbs and as the phases of the serve progress, the limbs of the upper
body become predominantly involved. The kinetic chain generates high ball
velocity, as do many other biomechanical principles. In the preparation stage
of the serve, the non-preferred foot should be lined up diagonally across the
court, and the preferred foot parallel with the base line. This will provide
good base support of the body, and align the body with the court to determine
the direction of the balls intended path. During the ball release phase, the
servers angular momentum is increased as they swing the arms, in order to reach
high ball velocity (Martin, Kulpa, Delamarche & Bideau, 2012) and the
acceleration of the racquet and therefore, the ball (Martin, et al., 2012). This
is where the non-preferred side of the body will swing in the opposite
direction in order to compensate for the force being acted upon. Through
Newton’s third law, the explosive movement creates an equal and opposite
reaction in the arms due to the body’s changed state as a result of the angular
momentum. The more force that is applied to the ball from the racquet at the
perceived distance will also allow for greater acceleration, and the magnitude
of the force applied to the ball will determine its speed. Specifically in the
acceleration phase, the more amplified the arm speed is and the acceleration of
the racquet before it hits the ball will thus increase the force and overall
speed of the ball. Predominantly important throughout the last phase of the
serve but beneficial to concentrate on in all phases is the centre of mass and
ensuring that it is evenly distributed throughout the entire body. By
stabilising the trunk after the serve is taken the server is likely to have
greater balance which will allow them to prepare themselves for the next shot
to be returned to the opposition.
Throughout all of the biomechanical principles
stated, it is clear to determine that the serve is accurate and will have a high
speed through the use of the kick serve and the foot-up technique. The movement techniques discussed will
allow for optimal performance of the tennis serve, increasing the overall outcome to win more points and make it more difficult for the opposition to return the
ball.
How
else can we use this information?
Identifying biomechanical principles that can assist
in serving a ball with greater accuracy and a higher speed will maximise the
effectiveness for optimal performance. Through working with biomechanics and
understanding skill execution, particular parts of skills can be identified to
what needs to be adapted in order for the skill to improve. Because the tennis
serve requires many biomechanical principles, the specific skill from this
sport can be adapted to many other movements. For example, the serve requires
large forward angular momentum of the body, which allows the body to rotate
forwards to execute the serve, which can be similarly seen in the ball delivery
phase in cricket and also in javelin throwing. Implementing force upon an object can
also be adapted to many other sports with racquets or bats such as lacrosse and
cricket, as these sports require similar body movements in order to be
successful, and speed and acceleration is necessary to be incorporated to most
sports today.
By understanding the importance of biomechanics and
its use in sport, athletes, coaches and specialists in the field can determine
how efficient skill movements are and if improvements are necessary to benefit
the athletes performance. Many biomechanical principles can be transferred
between sports, so having appropriate knowledge in this field is likely to be
beneficial for athletes.
References:
Abrams, G.D., Sheets, A.L., Andriacchi, T.P. &
Safran, M.R. (2011). Review of tennis serve motion analysis and the
biomechanics of three serve types with implications for injury. Sports Biomechanics, 10 (4), 378-390.
Blazevich, A.J. (2010). Sports Biomechanics, the basics: Optimising human performance. A&C
Black.
Flickr. (2012). Tennis Serve Sequence. Retrieved from: http://www.flickr.com/photos/spschofield/6973424295 [Accessed 16 June 2015]
GPP Tennis. (2008). Kinetic Chain. Retrieved from: http://www.gpptennis.com/images/kineticlarge.jpg [Accessed 16 June 2015]
Flickr. (2012). Tennis Serve Sequence. Retrieved from: http://www.flickr.com/photos/spschofield/6973424295 [Accessed 16 June 2015]
GPP Tennis. (2008). Kinetic Chain. Retrieved from: http://www.gpptennis.com/images/kineticlarge.jpg [Accessed 16 June 2015]
Kovacs, M. & Ellenbecker, T. (2011). An 8-Stage
Model for Evaluating the Tennis Serve: Implications for Performance Enhancement
and Injury Prevention. Sports Health: A
Multidisciplinary Approach, 3 (6), 504-513.
Martin, C., Bideau, B., Bideau, N., Nicolas, G.,
Delamarche, P. & Kulpa, R. (2014). Energy Flow Analysis During the Tennis
Serve: Comparison Between Injured and Noninjured Tennis Players. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42
(11), 2751-2760.
Martin, C., Kulpa, R., Delamarche, P. & Bideau,
B. (2012). Professional tennis players’ serve: correlation between segmental
angular momentums and ball velocity. Sports
Biomechanics, 12 (1), 2-14.
Reid, M., Whiteside, D., Gilbin, G. & Elliott,
B. (2013). Effect of a common task constraint on the body, racket, and ball
kinematics of the elite junior tennis serve. Sports Biomechanics, 12 (1), 15-22.
Sheets, A.L., Abrams, G.D., Corazza, S., Safran,
M.R. & Andriacchi, T.P. (2011). Kinematics Differences Between the Flat,
Kick, and Slice Serves Measured Using a Markerless Motion Capture Method. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 39
(12), 3011-3020.
Tennis about. (2015). Point of contact on serve. Retrieved from: http://tennis.about.com/GrigorDimitrov [Accessed on 16 June 2015]
Web Tennis. (2015). Slice Serve. Retrieved from: www.webtennis.com/players/sliceserve [Accessed on 16 June 2015].
Tennis about. (2015). Point of contact on serve. Retrieved from: http://tennis.about.com/GrigorDimitrov [Accessed on 16 June 2015]
Web Tennis. (2015). Slice Serve. Retrieved from: www.webtennis.com/players/sliceserve [Accessed on 16 June 2015].
No comments:
Post a Comment